Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms:Logistics and Short-term Results

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Resch ◽  
Martin Malina ◽  
Bengt Lindblad ◽  
Nuno V. Dias ◽  
Björn Sonesson ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Piotr Kulig ◽  
Krzysztof Lewandowski ◽  
Bartłomiej Banaś ◽  
Piotr Piekorz ◽  
Andrzej Kostka ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Resch ◽  
Martin Malina ◽  
Bengt Lindblad ◽  
Nuno V. Dias ◽  
Björn Sonesson ◽  
...  

Purpose: To report our experience in establishing a treatment protocol for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA), including an investigation of the reasons for patient exclusion and a report of our short-term results. Methods: Between 1997 and July 2002, 21 patients with rAAA underwent endovascular repair according to our protocol and were followed prospectively. A retrospective analysis was also conducted of 23 rAAA patients treated with open repair from January 2001 through June 2002. Procedural and clinical data from this sample were compared to 14 contemporaneous emergent EVAR cases and analyzed to determine why the open repair patients were not treated with an endovascular approach. Results: Among the 21 patients treated with emergent EVAR since the beginning of this protocol, 6 (29%) procedures were performed under local anesthesia and 6 were performed percutaneously. Thirty-day mortality was 19%. In the comparison of 14 emergent EVAR cases to 23 open rAAA repairs, the mean duration of symptoms prior to intervention was 12 hours for the EVAR patients and <1 hour for OR patients. No significant difference was found in operating time, but the EVAR group had significantly less blood loss (p=0.0001) and transfusion needs (p=0.02); duration of intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter in the EVAR group (p=0.02). Thirty-day mortality was 29% (4/14) for EVAR and 35% for OR (8/23) (p>0.05). Reasons for not performing EVAR were unavailability of adequate equipment (n=11) or trained staff (n=7), hemodynamically unstable patient (n=2), mycotic aneurysm (n=2), and unfavorable anatomy in a 60-year old patient with a <5-mm-long, sharply angled infrarenal neck. Conclusions: Endovascular repair of ruptured aortic aneurysms is feasible, and short-term results are promising. Good logistics, adequate training of physicians and staff in an elective setting, and versatile endografts are prerequisites for this type of treatment program.


Swiss Surgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lachat ◽  
Pfammatter ◽  
Bernard ◽  
Jaggy ◽  
Vogt ◽  
...  

Local anesthesia is a safe and less invasive anesthetic management for the endovascular approach to elective aortic aneurysm. We have successfully extended the indication of local anesthesia to a high-risk patient with leaking aneurysm and stable hemodynamics. Patient and methods: A 86 year old patient with renal insufficiency due to longstanding hypertension, coronary artery and chronic obstructive lung disease was transferred to our hospital with a leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm. Stable hemodynamics allowed to perform a fast CT scan, that confirmed the feasibility of endovascular repair. A bifurcated endograft (24mm x 12mm x 153mm) was implanted under local anesthesia. Results: The procedure was completed within 85 minutes without problems. The complete sealing of the aneurysm was confirmed by CT scan on the third postoperative day. Twenty months later, the patient is doing well and radiological control confirmed complete exclusion of the aneurysm. Discussion: The endoluminal treatment is a minimally invasive technique. It's feasibility can be rapidly assessed by CT scan. The transfemoral implantation can be performed under local anesthesia provided that hemodynamics are stable. This anesthetic management seems to be particularly advantageous for leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm since it doesn't change the hemodynamic situation in contrast to general anesthesia. Hemodynamic instability, abdominal distension or tenderness may indicate intraperitoneal rupture and conversion to open graft repair should be performed without delay.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (S 01) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ebert ◽  
M. Langer ◽  
P. Uhrmeister

SummaryThe endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms has generated a great deal of interest since the early 1990s, and many different devices are currently available. The procedure of endovascular repair has been evaluated in many institutions and the different devices are compared. The first results were encouraging, but complications like endoleak, dislocation or thrombosis of the graft occurred. By the available devices the stent application is only promising, if the known exclusion criteria are strictly respected. Therefore a careful preinterventional assessment of the patient by different imaging modalities is necessary. As the available results up to now are preliminary and the durability of the devices has to be controlled, multicenter studies are required to improve the devices and observe their long- term success in the exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms.


2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. E503-E507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Watson ◽  
Thomas Tan ◽  
Lori Wiseman ◽  
Gary M. Ansel ◽  
Chip Botti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document